Legal Opinion

Burton v. Coombs

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1976No. 14245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

■ Defendants originally filed an appeal from the judgment of the lower court which awarded damages to the plaintiffs for breach of contract. Plaintiffs replied with a cross-appeal on the issue of damages and on the ruling of the court that defendants were not bound by their previous offer to settle. Thereafter, the parties stipulated as to the dismissal of all issues raised by the appeal and cross-appeal except for the issue on the acceptance of an offer to settle.

As a result of the stipulation, the sole question remaining for this Court’s consideration is whether or not the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smaligo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Trautwein v. LeaveyWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Apex Engineering Co. v. North American Oil ConsolidatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop Collins v. Gerald ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Guzman v. Visalia Community BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Cea v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. Peterson Plumbing Supply v. BernsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API