Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Fisher

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1973No. 285Published

1Opinion of the CourtVictor, J.

The plaintiffs (appellants), C. W. and Betty Jean Stanfield, seek specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real estate. Plaintiffs maintain that the defendant (appellee), Muriel Fisher, contracted to sell to the Stanfields real estate located in Clinton County, Ohio, and then breached the contract by selling it to another. Fisher denied all material allegations of the complaint.

At a hearing on a motion of the Stanfields for a temporary injunction, testimony was given and documentary evidence was introduced by all parties, after which Fisher orally moved for a “peremptory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. WestonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hotze, Kuntzler & Co. v. ErskineOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Steeg v. ScharenbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API