Legal Opinion
Multer v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 20, 1942No. Claim No. 26184PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, P. J.
Claimant, on February 19, 1941, loaned to the Kuo Hing Restaurants, Inc., $1,200 for the payment of a liquor license to be used in connection with the restaurant business of the corporation at 174 West Seventy-second street, New York city, for the year beginning March 1, 1941. In what is called the closing statement relating to the loan, which statement was dated February 19, 1941, and signed February 20, 1941, the corporation agreed as follows: “ In the event the liquor license is not granted or at any time after being granted is surrendered and upon ceasing to do business, the undersigned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rochester Distilling Co. v. RaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Titusville Iron Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Samuel Adler, Inc. v. NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Siegel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Engelhardt v. Alvino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Canale v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- Chemical Bank New York Trust Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Valenza v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942
- United States v. Raleigh RestaurantDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Rosenbaum v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.