Legal Opinion

Babbit v. Target Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 10, 2025No. 0:20-cv-00490Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TAMMY BABBITT and Case No. 20-cv-490 (DWF/ECW) WILLIAM CARTER, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Dkt. 373) (“Motion”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Motion. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. This Action On February 11, 2020, Plaintiffs initiated this putative collective action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals who have…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries, Ingersoll-Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API