Morris v. United States Department of Justine
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McDONALD, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial and defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. After careful consideration of the relevant law and the parties’ memoranda, the Court concludes plaintiff’s Motion must be DENIED and defendants’ Motion to Dismiss must be GRANTED.
This is a case filed pro se by the plaintiff in which he alleges that he was a patient at various mental hospitals and he was the subject of the motion picture, “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” Plaintiff’s complaint is rather obtuse…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tomas Menchaca and Wife, Irma Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Odie v. Evans v. Lester TubbeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Nolen v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arena v. Graybar Elec. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Harry Goldgar v. Office of Administration, Executive Office of the PresidentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- D Morris v. U. S. Justice DeptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Harrison County, Mississippi v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
- Lundy v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.