Murdoch v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County
1Opinion of the Court
Kreider, J.,
We have before us the petition of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, respondent, and the rule granted thereon directing plaintiffs to show cause why their petition in escheat should not be dismissed. Plaintiffs filed an answer to the rule. Similar petitions were filed and rules to show *575cause obtained by the Reading Company in no. 261 and by The United Gas Improvement Company in no. 270 Commonwealth Docket 1954. The Atlantic Refining Company in no. 263 Commonwealth Docket 1954 also raised similar questions in attacking the petition in escheat presented against it by filing…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Standard Oil Co. v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.