Legal Opinion

Harju v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 2, 2021No. 3:20-cv-06258Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 YVONNE HARJU, et al. CASE NO. C20-6258 BHS-JRC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 9 v. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION 10 JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., 11 Defendants. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 14 of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge, Dkt. 37, and 15 Plaintiffs Yvonne Harju, Doris Hosking, and Donald Hosking’s objections to the R&R, 16 Dkt. 39, and Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.’s objections to the R&R, 17 Dkt.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States of America, Exrel., Insoon Lee v. Smithkline Beecham, Inc. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Donyel v. Brown v. Ernie Roe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Falk v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
  5. Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API