Legal Opinion

Chapman v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1924No. 126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarous, J.

The city of Dallas brought suit to foreclose a street paving lien for about $400 against appellant, appellee, and a large number of other parties. The Texas Bitulithic Company intervened, and alleged that it was the owner and holder of the paving lien, and adopted the petition filed by the city of Dallas; At the time the street was paved the property belonged to R. C. Porter, and was by regular transfers conveyed to Pearl Mott, who assumed the payment of the paving lien, and who, before this suit was tried, had intermarried with C. C. Malt-man. Mrs. Maltman and husband, for answer to the suit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. OnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kincaid v. Lee County State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API