Baggett v. Mobley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
(After stating the foregong facts.) We are of the opinion that the court properly overruled the demurrer. The principal questions in the ease are raised by those portions of the demurrer attacking section 19 of the banking laws of this State, as amended by the act approved August 25, 1927, fixing the order and priority of claims (Georgia Laws, 1927, p. 199) against insolvent banks. This part of the act is attacked, first, on the *272ground that it is unconstitutional in that it contravenes the provisions of article 7, section 2, paragraph 1, of the constitution of the State, which contains the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herrington v. TolbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Landrum v. BroadwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tharpe v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Collier v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Tharpe v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Lowry v. McDuffieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998