Legal Opinion

Cirano v. Pantstudio Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs failure to advise the court, in its application for a default judgment, that it had commenced a prior action in New York County involving a related controversy, that the corporate defendant had appeared in that action, and that the action was still pending, was sufficient to warrant vacating the default (see, Oppenheimer v Westcott, 47 NY2d 595). The fact that defendant Raffaeli’s Italian counsel had learned of the default in connection with yet another action between the same or related parties in that country, over one year prior to the making of defendant’s motion, is not fatal,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Oppenheimer v. WestcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon Ex Rel. CIT Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1 v. MaroldaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Antonious v. MuhammedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API