Legal Opinion

Akers v. Gillentine

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1948PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

231 S.W.2d 369 (1950)

AKERS

v.

GILLENTINE et al.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

February 28, 1948.

Hoyt Bryson, of Woodbury, for appellant.

Sterling S. Brown, Woodbury, for appellees.

BURNETT, Justice.

This cause was heard by the Chancellor on the bill and the demurrer thereto of all defendants except one who filed a plea in abatement. The decree sustained the grounds of demurrer setting up the statutes of limitation of three and seven years and the plea in abatement:

The bill, as amended, alleges in substance that Akers, the appellant here, was a surety on the guardian bond of W.T. Gillentine who was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Fehn v. SchlicklingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  3. Powell and Smith v. BlakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Haynes v. SwannTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  5. State Ex Rel. Robertson v. Bank of GranvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McAllester v. Aldridge (In Re Anderson)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  2. Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998
  3. New York Life Insurance Co. v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rowlett v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  5. Akers v. GillentineCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API