Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Jordan

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1968No. 9480PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFARLAND, Chief Justice:

The State of Arizona, upon the relation of Gary K. Nelson, The Attorney General, brings this original action in quo warranto, asking that this Court adjudge the respond*91ent Jewel W. Jordan not entitled to hold ■or enjoy the office of State Auditor, and that a judgment of ouster be entered •against her.

The Twenty-first Legislature in 1968 adopted House Concurrent Resolution 1, and Senate Concurrent Resolution 6 each proposing to amend the Arizona Constitution, and reading respectively as follows:

“HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1
“A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

PROPOSING AN…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gabbert v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Monaghan v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tilson v. MoffordArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Mathieu v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mathieu v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API