Vanguard Military Equipment Corp. v. Schulein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The challenged counterclaim and cross complaint alleges an oral agreement between defendant-respondent, plaintiff and the impleaded defendants, which is vague, indefinite and uncertain. From the facts set forth the full intention of the parties to the alleged contract cannot be ascertained with a reasonable degree of certainty. Such an agreement is unenforcible. (Varney v. Ditmars, 217 N. Y. 223, 228.) The essential terms of a contract and the facts showing damage upon which the action is based must be pleaded. (King v. Krischer Mfg. Co., Inc., 220 App. Div. 584, 585; Janvier, Inc., v. Baker,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Varney v. . DitmarsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Walter Janvier, Inc. v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- King v. Krischer Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Garcin v. Granville Iron Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ziegler v. Mancuso & Alessio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Holt v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964