Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Florida Bar v. Jacqueline Marie Kinsella

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 20, 2018No. SC17-55Published

1DissentLewis, J.

I dissent to this Court's imposition of a mere three-year suspension. In my view, Kinsella's unethical conduct warrants disbarment. Attorneys who commit the egregious act of theft or misappropriating monies are appropriately disbarred. See, e.g. , Fla. Bar v. Anderson , 594 So.2d 302 (Fla. 1992). The majority attempts to minimize Kinsella's conduct as somehow soluble given her student loan debt. I find such flimsy mollifications to be unavailing. The "extensive" mitigation cited by the majority does not and cannot overcome the serious nature of the offenses that Kinsella committed. See…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. ShanzerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. The Florida Bar v. TravisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. The Florida Bar v. SpearSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. The Florida Bar v. NewmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. The Florida Bar v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API