Legal Opinion

Randall v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ACTION against the state to recover the amount of a claim for professional services, for which the legislature had refused to make any appropriation. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Cole, J.

This is an action brought against the state to recover the vaLue of certain professional services, *341rendered in attending to the taking of testimony before a com missioned The complaint states in substance that charges were filed before the Governor, against the sheriff of Milwaukee county for official misconduct; that the Governor appointed a commissioner to take and certify the evidence which might be offered in support of these charges; and that the Governor further designated and appointed the complainant being an attorney at .law,' to attend to the taking of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Larkin v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Young v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API