Legal Opinion

Seaman v. Strollo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 20, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

We agree with the Supreme Court that this case is controlled by the decision of that court in Sykes v. Heinzman, 100 N. J. L. 12, which decision we approve; but on the authority of that case we are impelled to reverse the judgment now before us.

Seaman, in occupancy of the office of city engineer of Long Branch, a city which had adopted the Commission Government act of 1911 (Pamph. L., p. 462), sought by certiorari to clear away the alleged appointment by the commissioner of streets and public improvements, of the defendant Strollo to the same…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tumulty v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Daly v. City of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. State v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. O'Brien v. ParnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Spears v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API