McLaughlin-gormley-king Co. v. Hauser
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, C. J.
The cause has once before been before this court. McLaughlin-Gormley-King Co. v. Hauser, 195 Iowa 224. The general facts in the case are stated in the opinion on the former appeal, and it is unnecessary that they be repeated herein.
I. Appellants predicate a claim for reversal on the refusal of the court- to sustain appellants’ motion for change of venue.
It is difficult for us to learn from the abstract, or from the arguments, the exact course of events and the dates thereof; but, as nearly as we can ascertain, the cause was continued, by agreement between the attorneys, from the September…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Overhouser v. American Cereal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- State v. BrainardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Rudd v. DeweySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Lauer v. BanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First State Bank v. TobinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- McVay v. CarpeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Eulberg v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Gibson v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Wright v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930