Legal Opinion

Raines v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1986No. 50540PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Claimants, the widow and the une-manicipated children of decedent employee, appeal from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying them worker’s compensation death benefits. Respondent employer, the City of St. Louis, moves to dismiss the appeal asserting claimants have failed to comply with Rule 84.04, which prescribes the content of appellate briefs. That claimants have failed to comply with Rule 84.04 in several material respects is undeniable. Their statement of facts and their points relied upon are not even marginally acceptable.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dillard v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Kasl v. Bristol Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Gray v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Hutchinson v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Higgins v. Missouri State Employees Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API