Legal Opinion

Caminez v. Sussman Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1910Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the answer raises an issue as to -the presentation and notice of dishonor of the check in suit, and judgment upon the pleadings should not have been directed. (Cassel v. Regierer, 114 N. Y. Supp. 601.) The failure to obtain an order directing the issues to be tried was waived by the plaintiff. (Tautphoeus v. Harbor & Suburban Assn., 96 App. Div. 23; Blenderman v. Bellis Co., 64 Misc. Rep. 65.) The appeal from the order denying the motion1 to set aside, the judgment is dismissed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tautphoeus v. Harbor & Suburban Building & Savings Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Cassel v. RegiererNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Blenderman v. J. R. Bellis Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API