Legal Opinion
All Restored Inc. v. Orzechowski
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided August 20, 2026No. N25L-08-005 SSAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALL RESTORED INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N25L-08-005 SSA ) CHRISTINE ORZECHOWSKI, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) Submitted: August 5, 2026 Decided: August 20, 2026 On Defendant’s Motion to Reopen Proceedings Delaware favors hearing matters on the merits. But the law does not permit a litigant to ignore the process. Mindful that this Defendant is a pro se litigant, this Court has sought to afford her an opportunity to be heard. However, “[t]here is no different set of rules for pro se plaintiffs, and the trial court should not sacrifice the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Andrew N. Farnese v. Alberto M. Bagnasco and Laila Covre, A.K.A. Laila Bagnasco. Appeal of Alberto M. BagnascoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Draper v. Medical Center of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Battaglia v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Cohen v. Brandywine Raceway AssociationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
- Apartment Communities Corp. v. MartinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004