Legal Opinion

United States v. Adrian K. Finnell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1994No. 93-2060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The government appeals from the district court’s granting of Adrian Finnell’s motion to suppress evidence obtained incident to a search of his luggage. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 and we reverse for further proceedings.

We refer all to United States v. Miller, 811 F.Supp. 1485 (D.N.M.1993), for the facts relevant to this appeal. We have concluded that this appeal should be remanded in light of United States v. Little, 18 F.3d 1499 (10th Cir.1994) (en banc), insofar as the factors evaluated by the district court do not constitute a nonconsensual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Bonnie Kaye LittleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Michael BloomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Penny HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1993
  5. United States v. Allen John Lemos, Jr., A/K/A J. LanceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FinnellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
  2. United States v. Adrian K. FinnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API