Legal Opinion
Iodice v. Calabrese
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1968No. 67 Civ. 887PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Motion To Remand
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are trucking companies, individual truckers and others who allege in the complaint that defendant union officer and defendant union have engaged in a course of action injuring plaintiffs in their business and occupa tions. The action was commenced in the Supreme feourt of the State of New York, Westchester County, on February 10, 1967. All parties are residents of Westchester County. On March 3, 1967, the action was removed by defendants to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 as an action arising under the laws of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mexican National Railroad v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Lorraine Motors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Prospect Dairy, Inc. v. Dellwood Dairy Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Iodice v. CalabreseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Iodice v. CalabreseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Mountain Navigation Co. v. Seafarers' International UnionDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1971
- Iodice v. CalabreseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- People of State of Ill. v. Sanitary Dist., Etc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.