Legal Opinion
State v. 2003 Infiniti G35 VIN JNKCV51E93MO24167
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 20, 2010No. 2009-CC-1193PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Justice. *
hWe granted a writ in this forfeiture proceeding to determine whether the courts below erred in their interpretation of La. R.S. 40:2610, a section of the Seizure and Controlled Dangerous Substances Property Forfeiture Act of 1989. This legislation established the requirements for an owner of, or interest holder in, seized property to file a claim with the appropriate seizing agency and district attorney to protect his alleged interest. For the following reasons, we reverse the district court’s ruling and remand the matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Unwired Telecom v. Parish of CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- City of Shreveport v. PedroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. $144,320.00 Tina BeersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- State v. Property Seized From Terrance MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. 2002 Chevrolet Trail BlazerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. $29,940.00 in U.S. CurrencyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.