In Re Havanec
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
DAVID F. SNOW, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtor in this case asserts that his exemption claims became final in the chapter 11 phase of his case since no creditor objected within the time specified in Rule 4003(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. The Trustee appointed after the Debt- or converted the case to chapter 7 argues that the Debtor is wrong on two counts: first, because the chapter 11 creditors meeting was never concluded and therefore the 30-day period specified in Rule 4003(b) never started, and second, because conversion of the case to chapter 7…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re LevittUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
- In Re VanceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1990
- In Re HalbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
- Matter of BergenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re: Wayne E. Bell, Jr., Debtor. Wayne E. Bell, Jr. v. Deborah BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
- In Re John Douglas SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Petit v. FessendenDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
- In Re DiGregorioUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.