Titsch v. Buzin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
David Allan Titsch appeals a final judgment of injunction against repeat violence entered against him and in favor of Daniel Buzin. The record does not support a finding of two incidents of violence as required by the applicable statute. Consequently, we reverse.
Section 784.046(2), Florida Statutes (2009), allows a victim of repeat violence to seek a protective injunction. The statute defines violence as “assault, aggravated assault, battery, aggravated battery, sexual assault, sexual battery, stalking, aggravated stalking, kidnapping, or false imprisonment, or any criminal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. BrooksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Sorin v. ColeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Gagnard v. StichtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Santiago v. TowleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Smith v. MelcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- H.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Cirillo v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- James Banks v. Kim D. McFarlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- HW v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012