Legal Opinion

Titsch v. Buzin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 13, 2011No. 2D10-354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LaROSE, Judge.

David Allan Titsch appeals a final judgment of injunction against repeat violence entered against him and in favor of Daniel Buzin. The record does not support a finding of two incidents of violence as required by the applicable statute. Consequently, we reverse.

Section 784.046(2), Florida Statutes (2009), allows a victim of repeat violence to seek a protective injunction. The statute defines violence as “assault, aggravated assault, battery, aggravated battery, sexual assault, sexual battery, stalking, aggravated stalking, kidnapping, or false imprisonment, or any criminal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrooksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Sorin v. ColeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Gagnard v. StichtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Santiago v. TowleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Smith v. MelcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Cirillo v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. James Banks v. Kim D. McFarlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. HW v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API