Legal Opinion

O'CONNOR v. Gragg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1959No. 3433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINGS, Justice.

W. A. Gragg brought this suit against Con J. O’Connor and H. G. McConnell seeking to establish a right of way across O’Connor’s lands by necessity, by prescription and in a trial amendment alleged a roadway by dedication. During the trial plaintiff abandoned his plea of a way of necessity. Plaintiff sought to permanently enjoin defendants from interfering with his use and enjoyment of the purported roadway. Defendants answered by a general denial and alleged that any use of the roadway by plaintiff, his predecessors or any other person or persons was a permissive use only…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oswald v. GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Owens v. HockettTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Dunn v. DeussenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Click v. Lamar CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Dortch v. Sherman CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Las Vegas Pecan & Cattle Co. v. Zavala CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. O'CONNOR v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lee v. Uvalde CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Dinwiddie v. American Trading and Production Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API