Legal Opinion
Toscano v. Olesen
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 23, 1960No. 560-60-YPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The motion of the defendant Donald Schoof for summary judgment, filed on October 28, 1960, heretofore argued and submitted is now decided as follows:
The said motion is hereby granted upon the ground that it appears from the pleadings and affidavits on file that
“there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S.C.A.
The Court approves the form of Findings and judgment lodged on October 28,1960, by the defendant and has signed and caused the same…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Alzua v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- James Francis v. Arthur T. LymanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShaneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Roberts v. BarbosaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
- Koch v. ZuiebackDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Green v. CauthenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Vander Linden v. CrewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.