Graham v. Peter K. Yeskel 1996 Irrevocable Trust
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion
*373 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
GROSS, J.
Some motions for rehearing take us to task for not writing at all. Others criticize us for not deciding correctly. Appellants’ motion for rehearing in this case is of the latter variety.
The seven page motion states that the panel opinion overlooked or misapprehended a number of points, including the following:
1. This case did “not involve any issue of vicarious liability, derivative liability, or joint and several liability.”
2. This case involved a claim “made against joint defendants — Richard and Ann Graham, a husband and wife who were sued as the owners of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willis Shaw Express, Inc. v. Hilyer Sod, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Lamb v. MatetzschkSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Barnes v. the Kellogg Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Hilyer Sod, Inc. v. Willis Shaw Exp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Hall v. Lexington Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.