Doughty v. Bayne
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBrune, C. J.
The question here is whether or not certain statements made by the defendant-appellant, John E. Doughty, were sufficient to permit a jury to find that he had acknowledged a debt which otherwise would have been barred by the Statute of Eimitations. The plaintiff-appellee, Clarence E. Bayne, brought suit in the Circuit Court ffor Worcester County upon a note allegedly made by Doughty. The case was removed for trial to Somerset County, where a jury found for Bayne. A motion for judgment n. o. v. or for a new trial was denied, judgment was entered for Bayne upon the jury’s verdict, and Doughty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oliver v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1827
- Ellicott v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
- Mitchell v. SellmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Weil v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Owings v. DayhoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mayor of Federalsburg v. Allied Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Mettee v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Jenkins v. KarltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Hall v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- United States v. Howard S. CulverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.