Legal Opinion

Miguel Martinez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 2016No. 14-15-00731-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Martha Hill Jamison, Justice

Appellant Miguel Martinez appeals from his conviction for murder. After the trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress his videotaped statement, appellant pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement with the State. The trial court then found appellant guilty and sentenced him to 20 years in prison in accordance with the plea agreement. In three issues, appellant contends that (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because a coercive interrogation rendered his statement involuntary, (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Billy Dewayne Denison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  2. Daniel Lee Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  3. Ex Parte Douglas Wayne Reed, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
  4. Ikeal Wade Gardiner v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2024
  5. Johntay Gibson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API