Legal Opinion

Dangelo v. Neil

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 7, 1983No. CA 82-459PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawson Cloninger, Judge.

The issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred by ruling that the consent of appellant, Edna Dangelo, the natural mother of Justin Dangelo, was not required for the adoption of Justin by appellees, Ernest Ray and Joann Neil. The court granted appellees’ petition for adoption after finding that appellant’s consent was not required, in that appellant had failed significantly, without justifiable cause, to communicate with or provide care and support for Justin for a period of over one year. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Under normal circumstances…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pender v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fonken v. FonkenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Bemis v. HareCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Belcher v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Shemley v. MontezumaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Bemis v. HareCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API