State v. Young

**346The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Rothstadt's well-reasoned opinion, reported at 448 N.J. Super. 206, 152 A.3d 955 (App. Div. 2017). We add the following comments.

The Appellate Division panel vacated defendant's conviction of permitting or encouraging the release of a confidential child abuse record in violation of N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.10b. Id. at 228, 152 A.3d 955. The panel held that N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.10b applies only to the Division of Youth and Family Services, now designated the Division of Child Protection…