Legal Opinion

Webb v. Webb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application dismissed. Memorandum: In order to support her application for an upward modification of child support, plaintiff was required to establish that the child’s needs were not being adequately met (see, Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132, 141; Matter of Tripi v Faiello, 195 AD2d 958). Plaintiff had the burden of establishing "specific increases in the costs related to the child’s basic necessities of food, shelter, clothing and medical and dental needs, as well as to the expenses associated with the child’s varied interests…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Miller v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Tripi v. FaielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Labita v. LabitaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bianca J. v. Dwayne A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Kinsella v. KinsellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Gentry v. LittlewoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. McArthur v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Bianca J. v. Dwayne A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API