Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gilbert v. City of Tekamah

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1986No. 84-638Published

1DissentKrivosha, C.J.

I must respectfully dissent from the majority in this case. I believe that the district court was correct in granting summary judgment. As noted by the majority:

A party is entitled to summary judgment if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with any affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact, that the ultimate inferences to be drawn from those facts are clear, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Smith v. Baker’s Local No. 433 Welfare Fund, ante p. 215, 375 N.W.2d 922 (1985).

In my view the appellant was barred from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lindelow v. Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rodgers v. Chimney Rock Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Garcia v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hess v. HoldsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Schwartz v. SelvageNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API