Legal Opinion
Gaines v. Bonnabel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 25, 1929No. 27825PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff is holder in due course and before maturity of five promissory notes executed by the defendant to his own order and indorsed by him in blank.
The several notes aggregate the sum of $38,1S0.05, were dated December 13, 1923, and due respectively in 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years after date. The notes were fully described in, and were identified by, the usual paraph of the notary, with an authentic act of mortgage bearing even date with the notes.
The act of mortgage contained the usual stipulations, including the stipulation that the failure to pay any one of the notes at its maturity…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maddox v. RobbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Griffin & Dyson v. Cowan, Dykers & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
- First State Bank & Trust Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Clark v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Iberville Bank & Trust Co. v. DupuySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louisiana National Bank of Baton Rouge v. HeromanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Torrey v. Simon-Torrey, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Torrey v. Simon-Torrey, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. DumasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Newman v. O. K. Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.