Brown v. Piedmont Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Shipp, J., Greenville, October term, 1914. Action by B. F. Brown, by his guardian ad litem, J. L. Brown, against Piedmont Manufacturing Company. From an order of nonsuit, the plaintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Before Shipp, J., Greenville, October term, 1914. Action by B. F. Brown, by his guardian ad litem, J. L. Brown, against Piedmont Manufacturing Company. From an order of nonsuit, the plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. cite: Duty to warn: 48 S. C. 190; 80 S. C. 567; 89 S. C. 390; 77 S. C. 69. Assumption of risks: 84 S. C. 286. Duty of master to inspect: 84 S. C. 290; 40 S. C. 109; 66 S. C. 485, 486; 52 S. C. 443; 38 S. C. 208; 37 S. C. 604; 35 S. C. 407; 34 S. C. 215; 18 S. C. 281, 282; 18 S. C. 262; 14 S. C. 443 ; 68 S. C. 514; 74 S. C. 19; 86 S. C. 441. Reliance on…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
This was an action for damages on account of personal injuries received by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant at Piedmont, S. C., on April 10, 1913, alleged to have been caused by the negligence and reckklessness of the defendant. The case was tried before Judge Shipp and a jury at October term of Court, 1914, for Greenville county and resulted in a nonsuit from which plaintiff appeals and by six exceptions alleges error on the part of his Honor in granting nonsuit. .
The plaintiff was 18 years of age and was employed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mew v. Charleston &. Savannah Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- Hankinson v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. Piedmont Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918