Legal Opinion
People v. Crooks
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 23, 2016PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stein, J.
Defendant contends that he was entitled to a hearing pursuant to People v Darden (34 NY2d 177 [1974]) to determine whether the information provided by a confidential informant (Cl) was sufficient to establish probable cause to support a search warrant for defendant’s apartment. Because there was a basis in the record for the determination of the lower courts that the police established probable cause based on their own independent observations, without having to rely on the statements of the Cl, a Darden hearing was not required. Therefore, we affirm.
*611I.
A Cl…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. SerranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. AdrionNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. CrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. CrissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. CooleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. Garcia-ToroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.