Legal Opinion

Rappuhn v. Primal Vantage Company, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided November 20, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00528Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION AUSTIN J. RAPPUHN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-528-CG-N ) PRIMAL VANTAGE COMPANY, ) INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER The fictitious parties set out in Plaintiff’s Complaint are hereby STRICKEN because fictitious party pleading is not generally recognized under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See, e.g., Fed.R.Civ.P. 10(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); Rommell v. Automobile Racing Club of America, Inc., 964 F.2d 1090, 1098 n. 14 (11th Cir. 1992); Weeks v. Benton,

649 F.Supp. 1297, 1298

(S…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weeks v. BentonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1986
  2. Rommell v. Automobile Racing Club of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API