Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Ditto

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 29, 2006No. 2005-CA-001823-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

Katie Beth Bennett, as a beneficiary under the will of Donna H. Wiseman, deceased, presents a novel issue in this appeal as to whether Wiseman’s alleged signature on her holographic will complies with the statutory mandates of Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 394.040 and KRS 446.060. Bennett appeals from an August 1, 2005, opinion and order of the Meade Circuit Court holding that the Meade District Court erroneously admitted into probate Wiseman’s holographic will. We reverse.

Wiseman died on July 28, 2002, a resident of Meade County, Kentucky. On September 3, 2002, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flood v. PragoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
  2. Lucas v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. City of Worthington Hills v. Worthington Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  4. Ward v. PutnamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  5. Weiss v. HanscomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Philip Willett as Heir of Frances J. Vessels v. the Estate of Frances VesselsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API