Legal Opinion

Needham v. Tepe

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 28, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00547Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Donald Paul Needham, ) ) Petitioner, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-547 ) vs. ) Judge Michael R. Barrett ) Timothy N. Tepe, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s September 23, 2022 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 2). Petitioner was given proper notice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), including notice that he may forfeit rights on appeal if he failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981); see also…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Randy Berkshire v. Debra DahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Wilson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API