Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Moreno

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 24, 1980No. QQ-246Published

1DissentErvin, Judge

I respectfully dissent to that portion of the majority’s opinion holding claimant’s right-side hernia noncompensable. I think there is competent and substantial evidence supporting the judge’s implicit finding that the hernia occurred immediately following the accident. As observed by the majority, *1321claimant testified that he felt excruciating right-side pain just after picking up a barbell during the course of his employment, and that his treating physician, upon hearing his history and examining him, diagnosed a right inguinal hernia which was surgically repaired in April 1975.

In my judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Exxon Co. v. AlexisSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Atlantic Marine Boat Yard, Inc. v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Cost v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API