Tate v. Jerman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: J. J. Ekuit, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff and defendant owned, respectively, lots 2 and 3 in block 6, in Viroqua, fronting easterly bn Main street and divided' by an east and west line. Plaintiff owned a store located something less than sis feet south of the lot line, with platform and outside stairway extending some three and one-half feet further toward that line.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: J. J. Ekuit, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff and defendant owned, respectively, lots 2 and 3 in block 6, in Viroqua, fronting easterly bn Main street and divided' by an east and west line. Plaintiff owned a store located something less than sis feet south of the lot line, with platform and outside stairway extending some three and one-half feet further toward that line. Defendant had buildings, on his lot, located about ten feet north of said dividing line, and in 1902 undertook to build a building on that ten-foot space. Plaintiff…
1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.
Careful examination of the evidence discloses no clear preponderance against the material findings of fact, from which judgment for defendant necessarily results. Frye v. Highland, 109 Wis. 292, 85 N. W. 351.
By the Gourt. — 'Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Frye v. Village of HighlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boyle v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906