Legal Opinion

Alvin v. Graff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1982No. 80-2347PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

Having carefully considered the briefs and arguments of the parties in this appeal, taken on undisputed facts, we find ourselves in agreement with the rulings of the Tax Court on the points brought forward to us: that interest reduction payments made by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the taxpayer’s-mortgagee’s behalf pursuant to Section 236 of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-l, are includable in his gross income, and that in the circumstances of this case the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is not equitably estopped by incorrect representations of law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Norfolk Southern Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  3. Patton v. DoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. Hofstetter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. Concord Consumers Hous. Coop. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API