Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 30, 1984No. 83-2988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that under the totality of the circumstances the identification was reliable, and there was no substantial likelihood of misidentification, even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction. Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 1987, 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981); Lecoin v. State, 418 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Lecoin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Ashley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988