People v. Betancourt
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The Appellate Division applied the correct standard for appellate review of the legal sufficiency of a wholly circumstantial evidence case. The evidence adduced at trial must be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, giving it the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, and the court reviewing the jury verdict must "determine whether the jury reasonably concluded” that the defen dant’s guilt was proven to a moral certainty (People v Marin, 65 NY2d 741, 742; People v…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Sunset BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by48 opinions
- People v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. CabreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. GadsdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.