Legal Opinion
DePaul Hospital v. Every
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1996No. 96-CA-39PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IzCANNELLA, Judge.
Plaintiff, DePaul Hospital (DePaul), and defendant, Lucille Every (Every), appeal a workers’ compensation judgment which awards Supplemental Earnings Benefits (SEB) to Every. We affirm the finding that Every is entitled to SEB, but we vacate the award, reinstate benefits and remand.
Every injured her back in 1990 while lifting laundry in the course and scope of her employment with DePaul. Based on wages of $187.60 per week, she received temporary total disability benefits in the amount of $122.06. On July 29, 1994, DePaul filed a Petition to Modify the Judgment, asserting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Coine v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bass v. SERVICE PIPE TRUCKING COMPANY INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Williams v. Hospital Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miley v. Bogalusa Fire DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Veal v. Trans Gulf, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998