Legal Opinion

United States v. Technodyne LLC

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 3, 2014No. Docket 12-4498PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Claimants Teehnodyne LLC (“Techno-dyne”), Padma Allen (or “Padma”), and Reddy Allen (or “Reddy”) (collectively “Claimants”) appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thomas P. Grie-sa, Judge, ordering the forfeiture of 23 of the defendant funds and properties to the United States. The judgments were entered by default after the court granted the motion of the United States pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2466, to strike Claimants’ claims to the 23 properties on the ground that Padma and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. SEC v. AhmedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Finn BatatoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. Kidd v. Thomson Reuters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. GattoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API