Legal Opinion

Crocker v. New London, Willimantic & Palmer Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 15, 1855PublishedCited by 19 opinions

This was an action of trespass, vi et armis, brought by John H. Crocker against the New London, Willimantic, and Palmer Railroad Company, to recover damages for personal injuries, occasioned by his forcible removal from the defendants’ railroad cars. • The defendants pleaded not guilty; and, on this' issue, the cause was tried at Norwich, at the term of the superior court, holden in December, 1854. It was admitted, on the trial, that on the day of December, 1853, after the…

Read the full summary

This was an action of trespass, vi et armis, brought by John H. Crocker against the New London, Willimantic, and Palmer Railroad Company, to recover damages for personal injuries, occasioned by his forcible removal from the defendants’ railroad cars. • The defendants pleaded not guilty; and, on this' issue, the cause was tried at Norwich, at the term of the superior court, holden in December, 1854. It was admitted, on the trial, that on the day of December, 1853, after the defendants’ cars had started from Norwich for New London, and while on their way to the latter place, the plaintiff, who…

1Opinion of the CourtSanford, J.

The defendants were a railroad corporation, running regular trains of cars on their road between the cities of Norwich and New London, and transporting passengers in said cars, as a part of their business.

They had established, and given public notice of “ a rule or regulation,” that the fare for passengers, in their cars from Norwich to New London, should be fifty cents, if it was paid and a ticket procured by the passenger before taking his ..seat in the cars, otherwise it should be fifty-five cents.

The plaintiff took a seat in the car, without a ticket, and when called upon by the conductor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Munford v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Son v. Hartford Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Jeffersonville Railroad v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Central Railway Co. v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. Terry v. BurfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Vigo Agricultural Society v. BrumfielIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API