Rosenbohm v. Cellco Partnership
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION NEIL ROSENBOHM, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 2:17-cv-731 Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless’s Motion to Dismiss and for an Adverse Inference Against Opt-In Plaintiffs Who Refused to Respond to Discovery Questionnaire or Provided Late or Incomplete Responses (ECF No. 76). For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schafer v. City of Defiance Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Clay v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.