Kuhlman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
This appeal is by the plaintiffs from an order dismissing their cause when their attorney failed to be present at the time of the call of the trial calendar, and from a subsequent order denying plaintiffs’ motion to reinstate the cause. We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reinstate the cause when it was established without controversy that the attorney’s failure to respond to the call was through misunderstanding and inadvertence rather than neglect or failure to prosecute the case. The pretrial activity proceeded normally with the trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Masser v. the London Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Beasley v. GirtenSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Crystal Lake Golf Course, Inc. v. KalinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Rashard v. CappialiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Goldman v. TaborDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. DeLoachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Troupe v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Estate of Mills v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979